Home | Apply
| Performance Measures | Technical
Assistance | Notices | Contacts | Dictionary
| FY
2008 Application Guidance |
OMB No. 0915-0247
Expiration Date: 03/31/2010
Dear Applicant:
The Children’s Hospitals Graduate Medical Education Payment Program
(CHGME PP) application package, which includes all applicable forms,
guidance and instructions, is enclosed. It is very important to
thoroughly read the detailed application guidance and instructions
before completing the required application forms. The material
contains information related to submission of both the initial and
reconciliation applications.
Your completed application must be mailed following the guidance
provided in the “Application Cycle and Deadlines” section of the
attached package. Applications must be received by the stated deadlines
to be considered for CHGME PP funding.
If you have questions regarding the application, please call the
Graduate Medical Education Branch at 301-443-1058 or e-mail at childrenshospitalgme@hrsa.gov.
Sincerely yours,
Marcia K. Brand, Ph.D.
Associate Administrator
Children’s
Hospitals Graduate Medical Education Payment Program (CHGME PP)
Application Package
Table of
Contents
| Section
I: Overview of the CHGME PP
Introduction
Administration
|
| Section
II: Application Cycle and Deadlines
Initial
Application
Interim Payment Determination and Disbursement (Based Upon
the Initial Application)
Assessment of Resident FTE Counts Reported in Initial Applications
Reconciliation Application
Final Payment Determination and Disbursement (Based Upon
the Reconciliation Application)
Electronic Availability of Application Materials
|
| Section
III: CHGME PP Application Forms
Cover
Page with Public Burden Statement
HRSA 99: Demographic and Contact Information
HRSA 99-1: Determination of Weighted and Unweighted Resident
FTE Counts
HRSA 99-2: Determination of Indirect Medical Education
Data Related to the Teaching of Residents
HRSA 99-3: Certification
HRSA 99-4: Government Performance and Results Act Tables
HRSA 99-5: Application Checklist
|
| Section
IV: Hospital Eligibility
Eligibility
Criteria
Changes
in Eligibility
|
| Section
V: Payment Methodology
Payment
Methodology
|
| Section
VI: Hospital Data Needed to Complete the CHGME PP Application
Data
Sources for Children’s Hospitals that File Full MCRs
Data Sources for Children’s Hospitals that File Low- or
No-Utilization MCRs
Data Sources for Children’s Hospitals that Have Not Completed
Three (3) MCR Periods
Data Sources for Children’s Hospitals that Have Not Completed
One (1) MCR Period
|
| Section
VII: Determining the Total Number of Resident Full-time Equivalents
Cap
and Cap Year
Adjustments to a Hospital’s Cap
Exceeding the Cap
Eligible Residency Programs (Approved Training Programs)
Eligible Residents
International Medical Graduates (IMGs)
Resident Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Counts
Initial Residency Period (IRP)
Weighting of Resident FTE Counts
Where Residents are Counted
Hospital Complex
Non-Provider/Non-Hospital Settings and Written Agreements
Partial Resident Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs)
Research Time
Resident FTE Count Accuracy and Documentation
|
| Section
VIII: Special Instructions for Calculating Reductions and
Increases to a Hospital’s 1996 Base Year Cap as a Result of
§422 of the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003
Decrease
to a Hospital’s 1996 Base Year Cap (§422 Cap Reduction)
Increase to a Hospital’s 1996 Base Year Cap (§422 Cap Increase)
|
Section
IX: CHGME PP Application Form Instructions
Number
of Inpatient Discharges
Case Mix Index
Number of Available Beds
Intern/Resident to Bed (IRB) Ratio
|
| Section
X: References
Determining
the Period of Eligibility
Calculating the Resident FTE Count for an Incomplete Cost
Reporting Period
Calculating the Case Mix Index (CMI) for an Incomplete Cost
Reporting Period
Calculating Discharges for an Incomplete Cost Reporting
Period
Calculating the Number of Available Beds for an Incomplete
Cost Reporting Period
Calculating Inpatient Days for an Incomplete Cost Reporting
Period
Calculating Outpatient Services for an Incomplete Cost Reporting
Period
|
| Section
XI: CHGME PP Application Form Instructions
HRSA
99: Hospital Demographic and Contact Information
HRSA 99-1: Determination of Weighted and Unweighted Resident
FTE Counts
HRSA 99-2: Determination of Indirect Medical Education
Data Related to the Teaching of Residents
HRSA 99-3: Hospital Certification
HRSA 99-4: Government Performance and Results Act Tables
HRSA 99-5: Application Checklist
|
Section
XII: References
Commonly
Used Acronyms
|
Section
I
Overview of the CHGME
PP
Introduction
In 1999, Congress
addressed the disparity of explicit graduate medical education (GME)
funding between freestanding children’s teaching hospitals and other
teaching hospitals by passing the Healthcare Research and Quality
Act, which established the Children’s Hospitals Graduate Medical
Education Payment Program (CHGME PP). The act was signed on December
6, 1999 and the legislation authorized the program for Federal fiscal
year (FY) 2000 and FY 2001. On October 17, 2000, the Children’s
Health Act of 2000 amended the Healthcare Research and Quality Act
of 1999 extending the CHGME PP through FY 2005. On December 23,
2004, additional amendments under Public Law 108-490 were made to
Section 340E of the Public Health Service Act affecting the CHGME
PP.
There are more
than 60 freestanding children’s teaching hospitals across the country
that train about 30 percent of the Nation’s pediatricians, nearly
half of pediatric sub-specialists, and provide valuable training
for physicians in many other specialties. These are the physicians
who care for America’s youngest population – its children. Almost
50 percent of the patient care that children’s teaching hospitals
provide is for low-income children, including those covered by Medicaid
and those who are uninsured. In addition, these hospitals are regional
and national referral centers for very sick children, often serving
as the only source of care for many critical pediatric services.
More than 75 percent of inpatient care at children’s hospitals is
devoted to children with one or more chronic conditions.
The CHGME PP
provides a more adequate level of support for GME training in U.S.
children’s teaching hospitals that have a separate Medicare provider
number. These hospitals receive relatively little funding from
Medicare for GME. Funding received by other teaching hospitals
from Medicare was expected to exceed more than $8 billion in FY
2005.
The CHGME PP
law authorized $280 million for payments in FY 2000, $285 million
in FY 2001, and “such sums as necessary” for fiscal years 2002 through
2005. Congress appropriated $40 million for the program in FY 2000,
$235 million in FY 2001, $285 million in FY 2002, $292 million in
FY 2003, $305 million for FY 2004, and $303 million for FY 2005.
For both FY 2004 and FY 2005 Congress implemented a rescission which
reduced the total appropriated amounts. In FY 2005, the CHGME PP
appropriation provided GME support to 60 children's hospitals in
31 states supporting more than 4,100 unweighted resident full-time
equivalents (FTEs) training in these hospitals. Since the inception
of this program, the program has disbursed more than $1.1 billion
in Federal GME support to freestanding children’s teaching hospitals.
Administration
The CHGME PP
is administered by the Graduate Medical Education Branch (GMEB)
of the Division of Medicine and Dentistry (DMD), Bureau of Health
Professions (BHPr), Health Resources and Services Administration
(HRSA), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). The objective
of the GMEB is to provide the assistance that freestanding children’s
hospitals need to ensure a future pediatric workforce that will
treat U.S. children.
Questions regarding
the CHGME PP should be directed to the:
Department
of Health and Human Services
Health Resources and Services Administration
Bureau of Health Professions
Division of Medicine and Dentistry
Graduate Medical Education Branch
Parklawn Building
5600 Fishers Lane Room 9A-05
Rockville, Maryland 20857
Telephone: 301-443-1058
Fax: 301-443-1879
Section
II
Application
Cycle and Deadlines
For hospitals
to be considered for CHGME PP funding, they must comply with statutory
eligibility requirements described herein and participate in the
CHGME PP’s application cycle, which consists of specific processes
for any given FY. These processes are guided by the CHGME PP’s
statutes and are described below.
Initial
Application
For children’s
hospitals, meeting all statutory and eligibility requirements, to
receive CHGME PP funding, they must submit a completed initial application
for CHGME PP funding in accordance with the established deadlines
noted below. During the initial application process, eligible children’s
hospitals provide the CHGME PP with information relevant to the
interim determination of payments.
Initial applications
for CHGME PP funding must include the following forms:
- HRSA 99:
Demographic and Contact Information
- HRSA 99-1:
Determination of Weighted and Unweighted Resident FTE Counts
- HRSA 99-2:
Determination of Indirect Medical Education Data Related to the
Teaching of Residents
- HRSA 99-3:
Certification
- HRSA 99-5:
Application Checklist
Applications
accepted for review must be completed following the application
guidance and instructions provided herein, submitted in English,
typed, and include the above completed forms and supporting documentation
as identified in the HRSA 99-5 (Application Checklist). The completed,
signed application package must be postmarked by August 1,
2007, and submitted to the:
Department
of Health and Human Services
Health Resources and Services Administration
Bureau of Health Professions
Division of Medicine and Dentistry
Graduate Medical Education Branch
Parklawn Building
5600 Fishers Lane Room 9A-05
Rockville, Maryland 20857
Application
materials are available electronically via the CHGME
PP website. Applications that are not postmarked by the specified
deadline will not be accepted for processing and funding and will
be returned to the applicant.
Interim
Payment Determination and Disbursement (Based Upon the Initial Application)
In accordance
with CHGME PP statutory requirements, information provided by participating
children’s hospitals in their initial applications for CHGME PP
funding is used by the CHGME PP to calculate payments for all eligible
children’s hospitals prior to the beginning of the FY (October 1st)
for which children’s hospitals have applied for CHGME PP funding.
CHGME PP payments, allocated to eligible children’s hospitals, are
a function of the number of resident full-time equivalents (FTEs)
participating in approved medical residency programs, inpatient
discharges, case mix indexes, and the number of inpatient available
beds, as reported by children’s hospitals in their initial applications
for CHGME PP funding. Payments are awarded for direct medical education
(DME) and indirect medical education (IME) expenses, respectively.
DME and IME payment calculations are subject to all rules, regulations,
and policies governing the CHGME PP.
On or after
October 1st of the FY for which eligible children’s hospitals
have applied for CHGME PP funding, the CHGME PP will begin making
interim payments. CHGME PP payments to eligible children’s hospitals
will be contingent upon the passage of the DHHS’ budget for the
given FY by the President. Children’s hospitals will be notified,
in writing, of the Secretary’s interim payment determination. In
accordance with CHGME PP statutes, payments will reflect a 25 percent
withholding from each interim installment (payment) for both DME
and IME payments, as necessary, to ensure that a hospital will not
be overpaid on an interim basis.
Assessment
of Resident FTE Counts Reported in Initial Applications
The CHGME PP
statute, Public Law 106-310, mandates that “the Secretary shall
determine any changes to the number of residents reported by a hospital
in the (initial) application of the hospital for the current
FY for both direct and indirect expense amounts.” Therefore, prior
to the end of the FY for which children’s hospitals have applied
for CHGME PP funding, the Secretary must determine (reconcile)
any changes to the number of resident FTEs reported by a hospital
in its initial application for the current FY, which will impact
final payments made by the CHGME PP to all eligible children’s hospitals.
This determination is done by conducting a comprehensive assessment
of the resident FTE counts claimed by children’s hospitals in their
initial applications for CHGME PP funding.
The CHGME PP
has contracted with fiscal intermediaries (hereinafter CHGME FIs)
to carry out an assessment of resident FTE counts (hereinafter the
“Resident FTE Assessment Program”) reflected in participating children’s
hospitals initial applications for CHGME PP funding to determine
any changes to the resident FTE counts initially reported. A 100
percent assessment of resident FTE counts reported by children’s
hospitals in their initial applications for CHGME PP funding is
performed regardless of the type(s) of Medicare cost report (MCR)
the hospital files (e.g., full, low- or no-utilization) for purposes
of receiving CHGME PP funding. This process is designed to assess
resident FTE counts for all children’s hospitals in an equitable
fashion and within CHGME PP time constraints.
The Resident
FTE Assessment Program requires participating children’s hospitals
to comply with requests from the CHGME FIs, within the time constraints
provided, as any changes to resident FTE counts in one children’s
hospital’s application for CHGME PP funding affects the distribution
of funds among all eligible children’s hospitals. To minimize public
burden, CHGME FIs use and build upon work previously conducted by
CHGME and/or Medicare FIs in prior years. The CHGME PP has made
available several guidance documents on the CHGME
PP’s website which provide further information about the Resident
FTE Assessment Program and documentation recommendations related
to the assessment of resident FTE counts.
At the conclusion
of the Resident FTE Assessment Program, the CHGME FIs will forward
final assessment reports to the respective children’s hospitals,
the Medicare FIs, and the CHGME PP explaining the results of the
review. The assessment reports include CHGME FI-generated HRSA
99-1’s, which children’s hospitals must use to complete their reconciliation
applications (see Reconciliation Application below). The assessment
reports may also include supporting documentation including, but
not limited to: adjustment reports, updates to the intern and resident
database, adjustments to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
(CMS) form 2552-96 Worksheet E-3, Part IV, or letters (to the Medicare
FI) requesting the reopening of one or more MCRs.
Reconciliation
Application
During the third
quarter of each FY (typically April 1st) for which payments
are being made, the CHGME PP will release a reconciliation application
for use by participating children’s hospitals to report changes
in the resident FTE counts reported in their initial applications
for CHGME PP funding. For children’s hospitals to continue receiving
CHGME PP funding, they must submit a completed reconciliation application
for CHGME PP funding in accordance with established deadlines noted
below. The resident FTE counts reported by children’s hospitals
in their reconciliation applications must be for the same MCR period(s)
identified in the hospital’s initial application for the subject
FY and consistent with those reported in the CHGME FIs FTE final
assessment report to be accepted by the CHGME PP. The resident
FTE counts from the final assessment reports are used to determine
the final amounts payable to children’s hospitals for the current
FY for both DME and IME. Children’s hospitals whose resident FTE
counts have not changed are not exempt from completing and submitting
a CHGME PP reconciliation application.
Reconciliation
applications for CHGME PP funding must include the following forms:
- HRSA 99:
Hospital Demographic and Contact Information
- HRSA 99-1:
Determination of Weighted and Unweighted Resident FTE Counts
- HRSA 99-2:
Determination of Indirect Medical Education Data Related to the
Teaching of Residents
- HRSA 99-3:
Hospital Certification
- HRSA 99-4:
Government Performance and Results Act Tables
- HRSA 99-5:
Application Checklist
Applications
accepted for review must be completed following the application
guidance and instructions provided herein, submitted in English,
typed, and include the above completed forms and supporting documentation
as identified in the HRSA 99-5 (Application Checklist). The completed,
signed application package must be postmarked by May 1, 2008,
and submitted to the:
Department
of Health and Human Services
Health Resources and Services Administration
Bureau of Health Professions
Division of Medicine and Dentistry
Graduate Medical Education Branch
Parklawn Building
5600 Fishers Lane Room 9A-05
Rockville, Maryland 20857
Application
materials are available electronically via the CHGME
PP website. If a children’s hospital fails to complete and
return a reconciliation application according to the terms and conditions
of the CHGME PP, the DHHS may suspend the award, pending corrective
action, or may terminate the award for cause.
Children’s hospitals
that were not eligible to participate or did not apply for funding
during the initial application process for a given FY are not eligible
to apply for and receive funding during the reconciliation application
process for the same FY. These hospitals must wait until the next
(initial) application cycle to apply for CHGME PP funding.
Final
Payment Determination and Disbursement (Based Upon the Reconciliation
Application)
The Secretary
will determine any balance due or any overpayment made to individual
hospitals following the determination of changes, if any, to the
number of resident FTEs reported by children’s hospitals in their
reconciliation applications as a result of the Resident FTE Assessment
Program. Children’s hospitals will be notified, in writing, of
the Secretary’s final reconciliation payment determination during
the fourth quarter (July 1st – September 30th)
of the FY in which payments are being made.
Children’s hospitals
that have been notified of an overpayment will have 30 days to return
the overpayment to the DHHS without accrual of interest. Children’s
hospitals that fail to return overpayments within the specified
timeframe will accrue and be responsible for any interest.
Reconciliation
payments will be made to individual hospitals on or before the end
of the FY (September 30th) in which payments are being
made. The Secretary will include in the reconciliation payments
funding initially withheld in accordance with statutory requirements.
All hospitals, whether or not they report changes to their resident
FTE counts during the reconciliation process, can expect changes
to their final payment determination as a result of resident FTE
count changes reported by other participating children’s hospitals.
This is due to the methodology used to determine CHGME PP payments.
More detailed information is available on the CHGME PP payment methodology
in Section V of this application package. Information on the payment
formulas is also available on the CHGME
PP website. DME and IME payment calculations are subject to
all rules and regulations governing the CHGME PP statute, including
the June 19, 2000 Federal Register notice for DME, the July 20,
2001 Federal Register notice for IME, and §422 of the Medicare Modernization
Act (MMA) of 2003 and all accompanying policies and regulations.
At the end of
the FY, the CHGME PP may make a final payment to distribute any
remaining funds, including those funds that have been returned to
the DHHS during the course of the FY as a result of overpayment
or hospitals’ loss of eligibility.
Electronic
Availability of Application Materials
Application
materials are available electronically via the CHGME
PP website.
Section
III
CHILDREN’S
HOSPITALS GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION PAYMENT PROGRAM APPLICATION
FORMS
OMB No. 0915-0247
Expiration Date: 03/31/2010
Public Burden Statement
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control number for
this project is 0915-0247. Public reporting burden for the applicant
for this collection of information is estimated to average 69 hours
per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed,
and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send
comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this
collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this
burden, to HRSA Reports Clearance Officer, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room
14-33, Rockville, Maryland, 20857.
INSERT CHGME PP APPLICATION FORMS AFTER THIS PAGE
(FORMS HRSA 99, HRSA 99-1, HRSA 99-2, HRSA 99-3, HRSA 99-4,
HRSA 99-5)
Section
IV
Hospital Eligibility
Eligibility Criteria
According to Public Law 106-310, a children’s teaching hospital
must meet the following eligibility criteria for CHGME PP funding.
The hospital must:
- participate in an approved GME program;
- have a Medicare Provider Agreement;
- be excluded from the Medicare inpatient prospective payment
system (PPS) under section 1886(d)(1)(B)(iii) of the Social Security
Act, and its accompanying regulations(1);
and
- operate as a “freestanding” children’s teaching hospital, as
defined by the CHGME PP.(2)
(1) A hospital
with a 3300 series Medicare provider number would meet this criterion
(i.e., 55-3300).
(2)A children’s teaching
hospital is considered “freestanding” if it does not operate under
a Medicare hospital provider number assigned to a larger health
care entity that receives Medicare GME payments.
Additional references:
- § Social Security Act, Section 1886
- § CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated March 1, 2001
(66 FR 12940)
Changes in Eligibility
A hospital remains eligible for CHGME PP funding as long as it
meets the eligibility criteria listed above and trains residents
as a “freestanding” children’s hospital during the FY for which
CHGME PP payments are being made.
If a hospital becomes ineligible for payments:
- it must notify the CHGME PP immediately of the change in status
and the date of the change; and
- it will be liable for the reimbursement, with interest, of any
funds received during the period of ineligibility.
Additional references:
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated March 1, 2001 (66
FR 12940)
Section
V
Payment
Methodology
Payment Methodology
CHGME PP funding to individual children’s hospitals is based upon
a number of variables, including the rolling average of weighted
and unweighted resident FTE counts, which are used to calculate
DME and IME payments, respectively. Payment variables and calculations
are subject to all rules and regulations governing the CHGME PP
statute, including the June 19, 2000 Federal Register notice for
DME, the July 20, 2001 Federal Register notice for IME, and §422
of the MMA of 2003 and all accompanying policies and regulations.
The rolling average is the average of the resident FTE counts reported
by the children’s hospital for the (1):
- most recently filed MCR (or the most recently completed MCR
period); and
- the prior two years.
(1) CHGME PP funding to a children’s
hospital that has not completed three (3) MCR periods will be based
upon the hospital’s resident FTE count from its “most recently filed”
or “most recently completed” MCR period until three (3) MCR periods
have been completed.
The rolling average resident FTE count includes all residents except
those that qualify for an adjustment after the averaging rules are
applied in accordance with 42 CFR 413.77.
The resident FTE count for any MCR period is based upon the number
of:
- allopathic and osteopathic residents following application
of the “cap”, where applicable; and
- dental and podiatric residents.
Effective “for portions of cost reporting periods occurring on
or after July 1, 2005”, the CHGME PP will not include resident FTEs
counted against the §422 cap increase in the 3-year rolling average
calculation for purposes of DME and IME payments. Additional
information regarding the CHGME PP’s implementation of §422 of the
MMA of 2003 is included in Sections VII and VIII of this application
package.
Additional references:
- Social Security Act, Section 1886
- 42 CFR 413.77 (CMS)
- CMS, Federal Register Notice, August 11, 2004 (69 FR 48916)
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated June 19, 2000 (65
FR 37985)
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated March 1, 2001 (66
FR 12940)
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated July 20, 2001 (66
FR 37980)
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated October 22, 2003
(68 FR 60396)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-1,
HRSA-99-2, and HRSA-99-4
Section
VI
Data Sources for Children’s Hospitals that File Full MCRs
To complete a CHGME PP application, hospitals that file full MCRs
(i.e., report residents to Medicare on CMS 2552-96, Worksheet E-3,
Part IV) must use the data as reflected in their:
- most recently filed MCR for the period ending on or before
December 31, 1996 (the “cap year");
- most recently filed MCR; and the
- prior two years.
In addition, hospitals who received adjustments to their cap (increases
or decreases) as a result of §422 of the MMA of 2003 must use data
included in and provide a copy of their written notification from
CMS regarding these adjustments. Additional information regarding
the CHGME PP’s implementation of §422 of the MMA of 2003 is included
in Sections VII and VIII of this application package.
Additional references:
- Social Security Act, Section 1886
- 42 CFR 413.77 (CMS)
- CMS, Federal Register Notice, August 11, 2004 (69 FR 48916)
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated March 1, 2001 (66
FR 12940)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-1,
HRSA-99-2, and HRSA-99-4
Data Sources for Children’s Hospitals that File Low- or No-Utilization
MCRs
To complete a CHGME PP application, hospitals that file low- or
no-utilization MCRs (i.e., do not report residents to Medicare on
CMS 2552-96, Worksheet E-3, Part IV) must use the data as reflected
in their hospital records for the:
- most recently completed MCR period for the period ending on
or before December 31, 1996 (the “cap year”);
- most recently completed MCR period; and the
- completed MCR periods for the prior two years.
In addition, hospitals who received adjustments to their cap (increases
or decreases) as a result of §422 of the MMA of 2003 must use data
included in and provide a copy of their written notification from
CMS regarding these adjustments. Additional information regarding
the CHGME PP’s implementation of §422 of the MMA of 2003 is included
in Sections VII and VIII of this application package.
Hospitals whose most recently completed MCR period ends less
than five (5) months prior to the stated CHGME PP initial
application deadline may report as their most recently completed
MCR period resident FTE counts from their most recently completed
or the previously completed MCR period.
Example:
Charlie’s Angels Children’s Center (CACC) will file a low-utilization
MCR for its 6/30/03 year-end. The CHGME PP application deadline
for FY 2004 is August 1, 2003 (approximately 1 month after CACC’s
year-end). CACC has the option of reporting as its “most recently
completed MCR period” data from its 6/30/02 or 6/30/03 year-end.
Since CACC needs time to close-out its resident FTE counts and
financial records for its 6/30/03 year-end, it decides to use
the resident FTE count data from its 6/30/02 cost reporting period
to complete Section 4 of HRSA-99-1. Consequently, CACC must use
data from its 6/30/01 and 6/30/00 MCR periods to complete Sections
5 and 6 of the HRSA-99-1, respectively. CACC must also use its
hospital data from its 6/30/02 cost reporting period to complete
all subsequent application forms (i.e., HRSA-99-2, HRSA-99-4,
etc.). CACC cannot use the resident FTE count data from its 6/30/03
MCR period until the next CHGME PP initial application cycle (FY
2005).
Additional references:
- Social Security Act, Section 1886
- 42 CFR 413.77 (CMS)
- CMS, Federal Register Notice, August 11, 2004 (69 FR 48916)
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated March 1, 2001 (66
FR 12940)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-1,
HRSA-99-2, and HRSA-99-4
Data Sources for Children’s Hospitals that Have Not Completed
Three (3) MCR Periods
If a hospital has completed at least one (1), but not more than
two (2) MCR periods, CHGME PP funding to the children’s hospital
will be based upon data from the hospital’s “most recently filed”
or “most recently completed” MCR period until three (3) MCR periods
have been completed. Hence, the hospital will not complete sections
5 and 6 of HRSA-99-1 and its DME and IME payments will not
be based upon a three-year rolling average resident FTE count.
Upon completion of three (3) MCR periods, the hospital will complete
sections 5 and 6 of HRSA-99-1 and will receive DME and IME payments
based upon a three-year rolling average resident FTE count.
In addition, hospitals who received adjustments to their cap (increases
or decreases) as a result of §422 of the MMA of 2003 must use data
included in and provide a copy of their written notification from
CMS regarding these adjustments. Additional information regarding
the CHGME PP’s implementation of §422 of the MMA of 2003 is included
in Sections VII and VIII of this application package.
Additional references:
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated July 20, 2001 (66
FR 37980)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-1,
HRSA-99-2, and HRSA-99-4
Data Sources for Children’s Hospitals that Have Not Completed
One (1) MCR Period
New children’s teaching hospitals (new to the CHGME PP) training
residents who were originally trained in a program that received
and will continue to receive funding under the CHGME PP are required
to wait until they have completed a MCR period before applying for
CHGME PP funding. These hospitals must also apply the 3-year rolling
average (to their resident FTE counts) in accordance with Medicare
regulations. Over a 3-year period, the “new children’s teaching
hospital” will gradually increase its number of resident FTEs that
can be claimed in the CHGME PP as the children’s hospital that originally
trained those resident FTEs gradually decreases its resident FTE
count for determining payments from the CHGME PP.
New children’s teaching hospitals (new to the CHGME PP) training
residents previously trained at a hospital that never received (or
is no longer receiving) funding under the CHGME PP are eligible
for CHGME PP funding without having completed a MCR period. In
addition, a hospital that becomes newly eligible for the CHGME PP
by starting its own “new medical residency training program” according
to Medicare regulation 42 CFR 413.79(e)(1) will also be eligible
for CHGME PP funding without having completed a MCR period.
Hospitals that are eligible to receive CHGME PP funding without
having completed a MCR period must follow the guidance provided
in Section X of this application package which provides special
calculation instructions for hospitals that have not completed a
MCR report.
Additional references:
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated July 20, 2001 (66
FR 37980)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-1,
HRSA-99-2, and HRSA-99-4
Section
VII
Cap and Cap Year
Section 1886(d)(5)(B)(v) of the Social Security Act established
“caps” on the number of allopathic and osteopathic residents that
a hospital operating an approved GME program may count when requesting
payment for DME and IME costs. A hospital’s “cap”
(hereinafter the “1996 Base Year Cap”) is currently
defined as the “number of unweighted resident FTEs enrolled in a
hospital’s allopathic and osteopathic residency programs during
the most recent cost reporting period ending on or before December
31, 1996 (the “cap year”).” The cap (i.e., limit) on the number
of allopathic and osteopathic residents is effective for all cost
reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 1997. Dental
and podiatric residents are exempt from the cap, but
are included in the resident FTE counts for all relevant years to
calculate the rolling average.
The “cap year” is defined as a hospital’s most recent
cost reporting period ending on or before December 31, 1996.
Example:
CACC had 75 resident FTEs enrolled in its allopathic programs,
25 resident FTEs enrolled in its osteopathic programs and 7 resident
FTEs enrolled in its dental and podiatric programs for its 6/30/96
MCR period (its most recent MCR period ending on or before December
31, 1996). Hence, CACC’s cap for Medicare and CHGME PP purposes
is 100 (75+25=100).
Additional references:
- Social Security Act, Section 1886
- 42 CFR 413.79 (CMS)
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated March 1, 2001 (66
FR 12940)
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated July 20, 2001 (66
FR 37980)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-1
and HRSA-99-2
Adjustments to a Hospital’s Cap
As noted above, Section 1886(d)(5)(B)(v) of the Social Security
Act established caps on the number of allopathic and osteopathic
residents that a hospital operating an approved GME program may
count when requesting payment for DME and IME costs. While Medicare
and the CHGME PP only make DME and IME payments for the number of
allopathic and osteopathic resident FTEs up to a hospital’s “1996
Base Year Cap”, some hospitals have trained allopathic and osteopathic
residents in excess of their 1996 Base Year Cap. There are also
a number of hospitals that have reduced their resident positions
to a level below their 1996 Base Year Cap.
Subsequent legislative actions and related Federal Register notices
provisions have been published addressing these issues allowing
a hospital’s cap to be permanently changed (increased or decreased)
by CMS or temporarily adjusted at the request of the hospital and
approved by CMS. These provisions are detailed below.
§422 of the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003
In December 2003, the President signed the MMA of 2003 (also known
as the Medicare Prescription Drug and Improvement Act of 2003),
Public Law 108-173. §422 of the MMA, added Section 1886(h)(7) to
the SSA. This provision reduced the 1996 Base Year Cap for certain
hospitals and redistributed those positions to other hospitals that
applied for and received an increase to their 1996 Base Year Cap
under §422. Hereinafter, any decreases to a hospital’s 1996 Base
Year Cap as a result of §422 will be referred to as the “§422
Cap Reduction” and any increases to the 1996 Base Year Cap
as a result of §422 will be referred to as the “§422 Cap Increase.”
Authority for implementing §422 of the MMA was delegated to the
CMS. Determinations made and implemented by CMS in response to
§422 are final and not subject to appeal.
Under the CHGME PP statute, by incorporation of the Social Security
Act provisions, the HRSA must implement the counting law and rules
of Medicare, which include those related to the implementation of
§422 of the MMA. Additional information regarding the CHGME PP’s
implementation of §422 of the MMA can be found in Section VIII of
this application package.
Medicare GME Affiliation Agreements and Other Regulations
Allowing the Establishment or Adjustment of a Hospital Cap
Hospitals that were not in existence for the most recent cost reporting
period ending on or before December 31, 1996 do not have a “1996
Base Year Cap” and are, therefore, “capped” to a resident FTE count
of zero “0”. Hence, hospitals must obtain (or adjust) their 1996
Base Year Cap (or lack thereof) in order to receive CHGME PP funding.
To provide an adjustment to a cap, the CHGME PP will allow hospitals
to add resident FTEs to their “1996 Base Year Cap” based on the
following Medicare and CHGME PP regulations:
- the formation of a new medical residency program as described
in 42 CFR 413.79(e)(1); or
- the execution of a Medicare GME Affiliation Agreement for an
aggregate cap, as set forth in 42 CFR 413.79(f) and 63 FR 26338
as published in the Federal Register on May 12, 1998, with the
following exceptions:
- A “new children's teaching hospital” participating in the
CHGME PP for the first year must establish an effective date
of the agreement for purposes of the CHGME PP. For the first
year, unless otherwise specified, the Department will use
as the effective date of the Medicare GME Affiliation Agreement
for an aggregate cap the date that the hospital becomes eligible
for CHGME PP funding. This effective date will only apply
to the CHGME PP. A hospital must also have an effective date
of July 1st for the Medicare Program. Subsequent
to the first year of the Medicare GME Affiliation Agreement,
the effective date must comply with the above-cited Federal
Register final rule, which specifies an effective date of
July 1st for all affiliation agreements.
The CHGME PP allows this exception because hospitals must meet
eligibility criteria and have their caps determined prior to the
CHGME PP application deadline. If the CHGME PP application deadline
occurs before July 1st, some hospitals would have a cap
of zero and thus be excluded from receiving funds. By deviating
from the prescribed Medicare final rule, the CHGME PP will not place
some hospitals in this position.
Unlike the Medicare Program, for the first year that a hospital
is eligible to participate in the CHGME PP, the CHGME PP will not
prorate the cap based on the effective date of the cap. Instead,
the full value of the cap as determined by the Medicare GME Affiliation
Agreement will be used. For purposes of the CHGME PP and its application
forms, a hospital that is now starting to train residents previously
trained at a hospital that never received or is no longer receiving
funds from the CHGME PP will be allowed to use the cap agreed upon
in the Medicare GME Affiliation Agreement until the full value of
the cap is reflected in the MCR. Afterwards, the hospital will
use the resident FTE count and cap from its filed MCR as indicated
in Section VI of this application package.
Example:
CACC opened as a freestanding children’s hospital on January
1, 2003 and would like to apply for FY 2004 CHGME PP funding.
The CHGME PP FY2004 application deadline is August 1, 2003. Since
CACC did not train residents in 1996, it has a cap of zero, but
was able to arrange a Medicare GME Affiliation Agreement for an
aggregate cap with Shirley Temple Medical Center in which CACC’s
current residents had previously trained.
CACC did the following in order to apply for CHGME PP funding:
- Established a cap by forming a Medicare GME Affiliation Agreement
with Shirley Temple Medical Center for an aggregate cap.
- The agreement had an effective date of January 1, 2003 (for
CHGME PP purposes only) and an effective date of July 1, 2003
and expiration date of June 30, 2004 for and in accordance with
Medicare rules and regulations.
- CACC and Shirley Temple Medical Center filed the agreement
with their Medicare FIs (the hospital’s have different Medicare
FIs) before June 30, 2003 (in accordance with Medicare rules and
regulations) and provided a signed copy to the CHGME PP following
acceptance by the FIs.
Hospitals that report residents to Medicare and are part of an
affiliated group may elect to apply the resident FTE limit on an
aggregate basis under Medicare rules and regulations. If the combined
resident FTE counts for the individual members of the group exceed
the aggregate limit, each hospital’s resident FTE cap will be adjusted
per the agreement between the members of the affiliated group.
These adjustments must be reflected in the filed MCR in order to
be considered for the CHGME PP.
Hospitals that receive an increase to their 1996 Base Year Cap
from CMS under §422 of the MMA of 2003 and participate in a Medicare
GME Affiliation Agreement under 42 CFR 413.79(f) on or after July
1, 2005, may only affiliate for the purpose of adjusting their (original)
1996 Base Year Cap. The additional slots that a hospital receives
under §422 may not be aggregated and applied (through Medicare GME
Affiliation Agreements) to the cap of any other hospitals.
Hospitals should refer to 42 CFR 413.79(f) for additional information
on adjustments to the cap.
Additional references:
- Social Security Act, Section 1886
- 42 CFR 413.79(f) (CMS)
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated March 1, 2001 (66
FR 12940)
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated July 20, 2001 (66
FR 37980)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-1,
HRSA-99-2, and HRSA-99-4
Exceeding the Cap
For DME payment calculations if a hospital’s unweighted
resident FTE count for allopathic and osteopathic residents exceeds
its FTE limit (“cap”), the weighted count is reduced by the ratio
of the resident FTE limit to the actual unweighted resident FTE
count for the subject cost reporting period. Additional information
regarding the CHGME PP’s implementation of §422 of the MMA of 2003
is provided below.
Example:
CACC, per its Medicare GME Affiliation Agreement, has a cap
of 100. For its 6/30/03 MCR, CACC reported an unweighted resident
FTE count of 150 and a weighted count of 105 for its allopathic
and osteopathic programs.
For DME payment purposes, CACC would determine its weighted allopathic
and osteopathic resident FTE count by taking its cap divided by
its total unweighted resident FTE count and multiplying that product
by the total weighted resident FTE for allopathic and osteopathic
residents [(100/150) x 105 = 70.00]. The weighted count of
any dental and podiatric residents trained during this MCR period
would be added to the 70.00 as dental and podiatric residents
are exempt from (i.e., not subject to) the cap.
For IME payment calculations if a hospital’s unweighted
resident FTE count for allopathic and osteopathic residents exceeds
its FTE limit (“cap”), the hospital must report the lesser of the
unweighted resident FTE count or the cap for the subject cost reporting
period. Additional information regarding the CHGME PP’s implementation
of §422 of the MMA of 2003 is provided below.
Example:
CACC, per its Medicare GME Affiliation Agreement, has a cap
of 100. For its 6/30/03 MCR, CACC reported an unweighted resident
FTE count of 150 and a weighted count of 105 for its allopathic
and osteopathic programs.
For IME payment purposes, CACC would report 100.00 [the lesser
of the unweighted allopathic and osteopathic resident FTE count
(150) or the cap (100)]. The unweighted count of any dental
and podiatric residents trained during this MCR period would be
added to the 100.00 as dental and podiatric residents are exempt
from (i.e., not subject to) the cap.
Impact of §422 of the MMA When a Hospital Exceeds It’s
Cap
§422 of the MMA will affect the determination of DME and IME
payments for each of the children’s hospitals participating in
the CHGME PP. The CHGME PP will begin accounting for the redistribution
of the 1996 caps under §422 of the MMA in determining DME and
IME payments starting with “portions of a hospital’s cost reporting
periods occurring on or after July 1, 2005.”
Children’s hospitals whose cap has been reduced under §422 of
the MMA will report and be paid based on the §422 Cap Reduction
effective “for portions of cost reporting periods occurring on
or after July 1, 2005.” The 1996 Base Year Cap will be used for
MCR periods prior to the effective date. Children’s hospitals
will be asked to submit a copy of the letter they received from
CMS informing them of the reduction in their cap that includes
the actual reduction. The full effect of the reduction for a
given hospital will take about three years following implementation
of §422 when all three MCR periods reflected in the hospital’s
application for CHGME PP funding are affected by the §422 Cap
Reduction.
For children’s hospitals who received an increase to their 1996
Base Year Cap under §422 of the MMA, the CHGME PP will not include
resident FTEs counted against the §422 Cap Increase in the 3-year
rolling average calculation for purposes of DME and IME payments
effective for portions of cost reporting periods and discharges
occurring on or after July 1, 2005. In addition, effective for
discharges occurring on or after July 1, 2005, the CHGME PP will
not apply the intern/resident to bed (IRB) ratio cap to the residents
claimed against a hospital’s §422 Cap Increase. However, residents
claimed against the 1996 Base Year Cap will be subject to the
3-year rolling average and will be subject to the IRB ratio cap.
Additional references:
- 42 CFR 413.79 (CMS)
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated March 1, 2001 (66
FR 12940)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA
99-1and HRSA 99-2
Eligible Residency Programs (Approved Training Programs)
Residents may be included in a hospital’s resident FTE count for
CHGME PP purposes if the residency program (in which the resident
is enrolled) meets one of the following criteria:
- The program must be approved by one of the following accrediting
bodies:
- Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME);
- Committee on Hospitals of the Bureau of Professional Education
of the American Osteopathic Association;
- Commission on Dental Accreditation of the American Dental
Association; or
- Council of Podiatric Medicine Education of the American
Podiatric Medical Association.
- The program may count towards certification of the participant
in a specialty or subspecialty listed in the current edition
of the Directory of Graduate Medical Education Programs (published
by the American Medical Association) or the Annual Report and
Reference Handbook (published by the American Board of Medical
Specialties).
- The program is approved by the ACGME as a fellowship program
in geriatric medicine; or
- The program would be accredited except for the accrediting
agency’s reliance upon an accreditation standard that requires
an entity to perform an induced abortion or require, provide,
or refer for training in the performance of induced abortions,
or make arrangements for such training, regardless of whether
the standard provides exceptions or exemptions.
Additional references:
- Social Security Act, Section 1886
- 42 CFR 413.75(b) (CMS)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-1,
HRSA-99-2, and HRSA-99-4
Eligible Residents
In order to be counted in CHGME PP payment calculations, a resident
must be:
- in an approved residency training program (see Eligible
Residency Program above);
and either
- a graduate of an accredited medical school in the U.S. or Canada;
or
- have passed the United States Medical Licensing Examination
(USMLE) Parts I & II (international or foreign medical graduates)
Additional references:
- Social Security Act, Section 1886
- 42 CFR 413.75(b) (CMS)
- 42 CFR 413.80 (CMS)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-1,
HRSA-99-2, and HRSA-99-4
International Medical Graduates (IMGs)
An IMG [(formerly known as a foreign medical graduate (FMG)] is
a resident who is not a graduate of a medical, osteopathy, dental,
or podiatry school, respectively, accredited or approved as meeting
the standards necessary for accreditation by the:
- Liaison Committee on Medical Education of the American Medical
Association;
- American Osteopathic Association;
- Commission on Dental Accreditation; or the
- Council on Podiatric Medical Education.
In order for an IMG to be included in a hospital’s resident FTE
count, s/he must have passed Parts I and II of the USMLE and be
enrolled in an eligible residency program.
Additional references:
- Social Security Act, Section 1886
- 42 CFR 413.75(b) (CMS)
- 42 CFR 413.80 (CMS)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-1,
HRSA-99-2, and HRSA-99-4
Resident Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Counts
Resident FTE counts are based on the number of residents training
at the hospital complex and certain non-hospital/non-provider settings/sites
throughout the hospital’s fiscal year. Residents are counted as
FTEs based on the total time necessary to fill a full-time residency
slot for the year.
For purposes of clarification, a resident FTE is measured in terms
of time worked during a residency training year. It is not a measure
of the number of individual residents who are working.
Additional references:
- Social Security Act, Section 1886
- 42 CFR 413.78 (CMS)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-1,
HRSA-99-2, and HRSA-99-4
Initial Residency Period (IRP)
Residents are divided into two categories, those in their:
- initial residency period (IRP);
- Effective July 1, 1995, an IRP is defined as the minimum
number of years required for board eligibility.
- For osteopathic, dentistry, and podiatric programs, the
IRP is the minimum number of years of formal training necessary
to satisfy the requirements of the approving body for those
programs.
- Prior to July 1, 1995, an IRP is defined as the minimum
number of years required for board eligibility in a specialty
or subspecialty plus 1 year (not to exceed 5 years with some
exceptions).
- and those beyond their IRP.
Example:
The IRP for pediatrics is 3 years. Therefore, the initial
residency period for all pediatric subspecialties (e.g., pediatric
cardiology) is three years.
The IRP for general surgery is 5 years. Therefore, the initial
residency period of all surgical subspecialties (e.g., pediatric
surgery) is 5 years even if the training program requires a
longer period of training.
A Pediatric Surgery (subspecialty) resident (or fellow) who
previously completed a 5-year general surgery residency program
and is now in his first year of subspecialty training (in Pediatric
Surgery) is beyond his IRP. His IRP was 5 years (general surgery).
Exceptions apply to the IRP for residents enrolled in preventive
medicine, geriatric medicine, transitional year and combined residency
programs. Refer to 42 CFR 413.79(a) for additional information
on the IRP and exceptions.
Additional references:
- Social Security Act, Section 1886
- 42 CFR 413.79(a) (CMS)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-1
Weighting of Resident FTE Counts
The CHGME PP, like Medicare, assigns a 0.5 (or ½) weighting factor
to residents who are beyond their IRP. Hence a resident who is
beyond his or her initial residency period is factored by 0.5 regardless
of the number of years or length of the training program in which
s/he is currently enrolled.
Example:
John Doe completed a 3-year pediatric residency program on
June 30, 1999 at CACC. Following completion of his residency
program, John continued his training in a pediatric cardiology
fellowship program also at CACC. During the first year of his
fellowship program (July 1, 1999 to June 30, 2000), John spent
40% of the academic year at CACC and 60% of the academic year
rotating to other teaching hospitals.
CACC’s MCR period is the same as the academic year (July 1 to
June 30). Hence, CACC would report John as 0.20 for the MCR period
ending June 30, 2000 [(40/100) x 0.5 = .20]. CACC must weight
John’s resident FTE count because the IRP for pediatrics is 3
years and John is in his 4th year of training (3 years
of residency training and 1 year of fellowship training).
For CHGME PP purposes, the weighting of resident FTE counts is
also applicable to the increase in resident FTEs based on §422 of
the MMA et al.
Additional references:
- Social Security Act, Section 1886
- 42 CFR 413.79(b) (CMS)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-1
Where Residents Are Counted
The time a resident spends anywhere within the hospital complex
(see “Hospital Complex” below) may be included in the resident FTE
count for CHGME PP purposes. In addition, the time spent by residents
in certain non-hospital/non-provider settings/sites is counted if
the criteria identified below (under “Non-Provider/Non-Hospital
Settings and Written Agreements”) are met.
Additional references:
- Social Security Act, Section 1886
- 42 CFR 413.78 (CMS)
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated March 1, 2001 (66
FR 12940)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-1,
HRSA-99-2, and HRSA-99-4
Hospital Complex
The time a resident spends anywhere within the hospital complex
(as defined in 42 CFR 413.65) may be included in the resident FTE
count for CHGME PP purposes.
The CMS final rule implementing the per resident amount (PRA) methodology
for payment of the direct GME costs of approved GME activities defines
a hospital complex as “hospitals and hospital-based providers and
sub providers” (54 FR 40286, September 29, 1989). The term “hospital”
is defined in Section 1861(e) of the Social Security Act as, in
part, an institution which is primarily engaged in providing, by
or under the supervision of physicians, diagnostic and therapeutic
services to inpatients. The term “provider of services” is defined
in Section 1861(u) of the Social Security Act as a hospital, skilled
nursing facility, comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility,
home health agency, hospice program, or, for purposes of Section
1814(g) and Section 1835(c), a fund. The term “sub provider” is
defined in the Provider Reimbursement Manual (PRM) Part II, Section
2405(b) as “a portion of a general hospital which has been issued
a sub provider identification number because it offers a clearly
different type of service from the remainder of the hospital, such
as long-term psychiatric.”
The CHGME PP, however, does not differentiate between PPS and non-PPS
locations within a hospital complex.
Additional references:
- Social Security Act, Section 1886
- 42 CFR 413.65 (CMS)
- 42 CFR 413.78(a) (CMS)
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated March 1, 2001 (66
FR 12940)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-1,
HRSA-99-2, and HRSA-99-4
Non-Provider/Non-Hospital Settings and Written Agreements
The time a resident spends in a non-provider (or non-hospital)
setting such as a physician’s office or a freestanding community
health center in connection with an approved program may be included
in the resident FTE count if the criteria in Federal regulation
42 CFR 413.78 are met. For CHGME PP purposes, 42 CFR 413.78 applies
to both DME and IME funding received under the CHGME PP.
Written agreements covering residents’ time spent in non-provider/non-hospital
settings shall cover a period of one year and must commence on the
start of the cost reporting period and must be between the hospital
and the non-hospital setting, not between the related School of
Medicine (SOM), School of Podiatric Medicine (SOPM), or School of
Dentistry (SOD). Refer to 42 CFR 413.78 for additional information
on written agreements.
Additional references and application forms:
- Social Security Act, Section 1886
- 42 CFR 413.78 (CMS)
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated March 1, 2001 (66
FR 12940)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-1,
HRSA-99-2, and HRSA-99-4
Partial Resident Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs)
A partial resident FTE is a resident who does not spend all time
that is part of the approved training program in the hospital complex
or qualified non-hospital setting. A resident will count as a partial
resident FTE based on the proportion of allowable time worked at
the children’s hospital and qualified non-hospital (provider) settings
compared to the total time necessary to fill a full-time residency
slot. Instances where a resident would be counted as a partial
resident FTE include, if the resident:
- is part-time;
- rotates to other hospitals as part of the approved training
program sponsored by the children’s hospital;
- is in a program sponsored by another hospital and spends one
or more rotations at the children's hospital;
- is on maternity leave;
- joins or leaves a program mid-year; or
- passes the USMLE mid-year.
Hospitals should consult with their FIs regarding additional exceptions.
The sum of partial FTE resident counts at all institutions where
an individual resident works as part of his/her approved residency
program may not exceed 1.0 FTE. Also, time spent by residents moonlighting
may not be counted.
Example:
During the course of the year, a full-time resident in orthopedic
surgery spends 90 days at the children’s hospital and 275 days
at the hospital sponsoring the residency program. The resident
would count as a 0.25 FTE at the children’s hospital [90/365 =
0.2465 (rounded to 0.25)].
A part-time third year resident in pediatrics works 4 days week.
The normal workweek for a full time third year pediatric residents
is 6 days per week. The resident would count as 0.67 FTE [4/6
= .6666 (rounded to 0.67)]
During the course of the year, a full-time resident (who is also
a foreign medical graduate) is enrolled in his second year of
a three-year family practice residency program at CACC. The resident
spends the entire academic year (2000-2001) at CACC and does not
rotate to any other sites. The resident took and passed Part
I of the USMLE in September 2000. On May 1, 2001, the resident
sat for Part II of the USMLE and is awaiting the examination results.
In June 2001 the resident learns that he passed Part II of the
USMLE. Since CACC’s year-end is June 30, CACC may count and include
the resident in their resident FTE counts (as a partial FTE) for
the period May 1, 2001 (the date he took the examination) to June
30, 2001 (CACC’s year end). The resident would count as 0.17
FTE [61 days (31 days in May + 30 days in June)/ 365 days = 0.1671
(rounded to 0.17)].
Additional references:
- Social Security Act, Section 1886
- 42 CFR 413.78(b) (CMS)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-1,
HRSA-99-2, and HRSA-99-4
Research Time
Research may be included in a hospital’s resident FTE count if
the research is part of the residency program and the resident carries
out the research in:
- the children’s hospital complex (clinical or bench research);
or
- in a non-provider setting where the research involves patient
care and the compensation for both the residents, the faculty
and other teaching costs are paid by the children’s hospital (requirements
listed at 42 CFR 413.78 must be met (66 FR 39896, Aug. 1, 2001)).
Additional references:
- Social Security Act, Section 1886
- 42 CFR 413.75 (CMS)
- 42 CFR 413.78 (CMS)
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated March 1, 2001 (66
FR 12940)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-1,
HRSA 99-2, and HRSA 99-4
Resident FTE Count Accuracy and Documentation
Children’s hospitals are responsible for the accuracy of the resident
FTE counts submitted to HRSA and are subject to audit. More specifically,
the Secretary, by statute, must “determine any changes to the number
of residents reported by a hospital in the (initial) application
of the hospital for the current FY for both direct and indirect
expense amounts.” This mandate is accomplished through the Resident
FTE Assessment Program carried out by the CHGME PP (see “Application
Cycle and Deadlines”). Children’s hospitals are not required to
submit with their completed initial applications for CHGME PP funding,
documentation in support of the resident FTE data reported in their
applications. However, at the time children’s hospitals certify
their applications (i.e., sign and submit form HRSA 99-3 to the
CHGME PP), the hospital should possess documentation in accordance
with 413.75(d) and other applicable Medicare record-keeping regulations.
Hospitals that do not report resident FTE counts to Medicare are
not exempt from this policy.
The CHGME PP has developed a Documentation Guidance (document)
and an accompanying sample documentation binder to assist participating
hospitals in collecting and providing the documentation necessary
to support resident FTEs reported by a children’s hospital in its
initial application for CHGME PP funding. Participating children’s
hospitals can use this document and the accompanying sample binder
for compiling and organizing the information/data to be provided
to the CHGME FI during the Resident FTE Assessment process. The
Documentation Guidance (document) is available at http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/childrenshospitalgme/apply.htm.
Additional references:
- 42 CFR 413.20 (CMS)
- 42 CFR 413.24 (CMS)
- 42 CFR 413.75(d) (CMS)
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated March 1, 2001 (66
FR 12940)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-1,
HRSA 99-2, and HRSA 99-4
Section
VIII
Special Instructions for Calculating Reductions and Increases
to a Hospital’s 1996 Base Year Cap as a Result of §422 of the Medicare
Modernization Act of 2003
Hospitals that received an increase or reduction to their 1996
Base Year Cap as a result of §422 of the MMA must use the following
methodology for calculating and claiming resident FTE counts against
their caps.
Decrease to a Hospital’s 1996 Base Year Cap (§422 Cap Reduction)
Children’s hospitals who received a decrease to their 1996 Base
Year Cap as a result of §422 of the MMA will report and be paid
based on the §422 Cap Reduction effective “for portions of cost
reporting periods occurring on or after July 1, 2005.” The 1996
Base Year Cap will be used for MCR periods prior to the effective
date. Children’s hospitals will be asked to submit a copy of the
letter they received from CMS informing them of the reduction in
their cap that includes the actual reduction amount. The full effect
of the reduction for a given hospital will take about three years
following the implementation of §422 when all three MCR periods
reflected in the hospital’s application for CHGME PP funding are
subject to the §422 Cap Reduction.
Example:
CACC had 75 resident FTEs enrolled in its allopathic programs,
25 resident FTEs enrolled in its osteopathic programs and 7 resident
FTEs enrolled in its dental and podiatric programs for its 6/30/96
MCR period (its most recent MCR period ending on or before December
31, 1996). Hence, CACC’s 1996 Base Year Cap for Medicare and
CHGME PP purposes is 100 (75+25=100). However, in December 2004
CACC received a letter from CMS indicating that their 1996 Base
Year Cap would be reduced by 7.50 resident FTEs under §422 of
the MMA. CACC’s new, revised cap is now 92.50 (1996 Base Year
Cap - §422 Cap Reduction). Any dental and podiatric residents
trained during this MCR period would not be included in the 1996
Base Year Cap or the “new, revised” cap as dental and podiatric
residents are exempt from (i.e., not subject to) the cap.
Increase to a Hospital’s 1996 Base Year Cap (§422 Cap Increase)
Children’s hospitals who received an increase to their 1996 Base
Year Cap as a result of §422 of the MMA will report and be paid
based on the §422 Cap Increase effective “for portions of cost reporting
periods occurring on or after July 1, 2005.” The 1996 Base Year
Cap will be used for MCR periods prior to the effective date. Children’s
hospitals will be asked to submit a copy of the letter they received
from CMS informing them of the adjustment to their cap that includes
the actual increase amount. It is important to note that a §422
Cap Increase is not automatically added to a hospital’s 1996 Base
Year Cap. A hospital’s ability to utilize their §422 Cap Increase
is contingent upon whether the hospital is training above or below
their 1996 Base Year Cap. Examples are provided below.
Examples (for Hospitals Training “Above” Their 1996 Base
Year Cap):
CACC had 75 resident FTEs enrolled in its allopathic programs,
25 resident FTEs enrolled in its osteopathic programs and 7 resident
FTEs enrolled in its dental and podiatric programs for its 6/30/96
MCR period (its most recent MCR period ending on or before December
31, 1996). Hence, CACC’s 1996 Base Year Cap for Medicare and
CHGME PP purposes is 100 (75+25=100). However, in December 2004
CACC received a letter from CMS indicating that their 1996 Base
Year Cap would be increased by 20 resident FTEs under §422 of
the MMA. CACC now has a 1996 Base Year Cap of 100 and a §422
Cap Increase of 20.
Example #1: During CACC’s most recent MCR period, CACC claimed
110 allopathic and osteopathic resident FTEs and 7 dental and
podiatric resident FTEs. Based on CACC’s 1996 Base Year Cap of
100 and §422 Cap Increase of 20, CACC would claim 100 resident
FTEs against its 1996 Base Year Cap and the remaining 10 resident
FTEs would be claimed against its §422 Cap Increase. Any dental
and podiatric residents trained during this MCR period would be
added to the total (un)weighted allopathic and osteopathic resident
FTEs following application of the caps as dental and podiatric
residents are exempt from (i.e., not subject to) the cap.
Example #2: During CACC’s most recent MCR period, CACC claimed
140 allopathic and osteopathic resident FTEs and 7 dental and
podiatric resident FTEs. Based on CACC’s 1996 Base Year Cap of
100 and §422 Cap Increase of 20, CACC would claim 100 resident
FTEs against its 1996 Base Year Cap and the remaining 40 resident
FTEs would be claimed against its §422 Cap Increase. As CACC’s
number of resident FTEs claimed exceeds both its 1996 Base Year
Cap and its §422 Cap Increase, the DME and IME payment calculation
methodology described in Section VII of this application package
(“Exceeding the Cap”) would be followed. Any dental and podiatric
residents trained during this MCR period would be added to the
total (un)weighted allopathic and osteopathic resident FTEs following
application of the caps as dental and podiatric residents are
exempt from (i.e., not subject to) the cap.
Examples (for Hospitals Training “Below” Their 1996 Base
Year Cap):
Example #1: During CACC’s most recent MCR period, CACC claimed
95 allopathic and osteopathic resident FTEs and 7 dental and podiatric
resident FTEs. Based on CACC’s 1996 Base Year Cap of 100 and
a §422 Cap Increase of 20, CACC would claim 95 resident FTEs against
its 1996 Base Year Cap and zero “0” residents against its §422
Cap Increase. Any dental and podiatric residents trained during
this MCR period would be added to the total (un)weighted allopathic
and osteopathic resident FTEs following application of the caps
as dental and podiatric residents are exempt from (i.e., not subject
to) the cap
Additional references:
- Social Security Act, Section 1886(h)(7)
- 42 CFR 413.79(b) (Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services,
formerly the Health Care Financing Administration)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-1
Section
IX
Special Instructions for Calculating
Indirect Medical Education Payment Variables
Hospitals applying for IME payments should follow the instructions
provided below when calculating inpatient discharges, CMI, available
beds, and the intern/resident to bed ratio. Additional information
and “calculation” instructions are provided in Section X of this
application package for hospitals that are eligible to begin receiving
CHGME PP funding without having completed a MCR period.
Number of Inpatient Discharges
The number of inpatient discharges is a measure of a hospital’s
inpatient care. This measure is defined as the sum of all daily
inpatient discharges for the hospital’s most recently filed (or
most recently completed) MCR period from all parts of the hospital
complex including healthy newborns from the healthy newborn nursery.
Pubic Law 108-490 does not exclude inpatient discharges associated
with healthy newborns inpatient stays in the “well baby” nursery.
Additional references:
- Social Security Act, Section 1886
- Public Law 108-490, December 23, 2004
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated March 1, 2001 (66
FR 12940)
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated July 20, 2001 (66
FR 37986)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-2
Case Mix Index (CMI)
The CMI is the sum of the diagnosis-related group (DRG) weights
for all inpatient discharges excluding healthy newborns from
the most recently filed (or most recently completed) MCR period
divided by the number of inpatient discharges for the same period.
All hospitals applying for IME payments must submit a CMI on all
inpatients discharges using the appropriate CMS DRG version, excluding
healthy newborns. This value must be reported to four decimal
points. The CMS DRG version to be used for CHGME PP purposes is
published, through the CHGME PP alert system each spring, prior
to the beginning of the FY for which payments will be made. The
principles in determining the version of the CMS grouper is delineated
is the July 20, 2001 CHGME PP Federal Register Notice.
Additional references:
- Social Security Act, Section 1886
- Public Law 108-490, December 23, 2004
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated March 1, 2001 (66
FR 12940)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-2
Number of Available Beds
An available bed is defined as an adult or pediatric bed, including
beds or bassinets available for lodging inpatients including beds
in intensive care units, coronary care units, neonatal intensive
care units, short stay units, and other special care inpatient hospital
units. Beds in the following location are excluded: healthy newborn
nursery, labor rooms, post-anesthesia or post-operative recovery
rooms, outpatient areas, emergency rooms, ancillary departments,
nurses’ and other staff residence, and other areas as are regularly
maintained and utilized for purposes other than lodging inpatients.
To be considered an available bed, a bed must be permanently maintained
for lodging inpatients. It must be available for use and housed
in patient rooms or wards (i.e. not in corridors or temporary beds).
CMS in its August 11, 2004, final inpatient PPS Federal Register
Notice, revised its regulations at 42 CFR 412.105(b) and 412.106(a)(1)(ii)
to specify that bed days in a unit that was occupied to inpatient
care for at least one day during the preceding 3 months are included
in the available bed day count for a month. In addition, bed
days for any beds within a unit that would otherwise be considered
occupied should be excluded from the available bed day count for
the current month if the bed has remained unavailable (could not
be made available for patient occupancy within 24 hours) for 30
consecutive days, or if the bed is used to provide outpatient observation
services or swing bed skilled nursing care. This clarified
policy is effective for discharges occurring on or after October
1, 2004.
The available bed count for the current or prior MCR period is
the sum of all available beds per day in the cost reporting period,
excluding beds and bassinets in the healthy newborn nursery,
divided by the number of days in that period.
Additional references:
- Social Security Act, Section 1886
- Public Law 108-490, December 23, 2004
- 42CFR412.105(b)
- 42 CFR 412.106(a)(1)(ii)
- CMS, Federal Register Notice dated August 11, 2004 (69
FR 48916)
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated March 1, 2001 (66
FR 12940)
- CHGME PP, Federal Register Notice dated July 20, 2001
(66 FR 37980, 37986)
Applicable to the following application forms: HRSA-99-2
Intern/Resident to Bed (IRB) Ratio
The IRB ratio for the most recently filed (or most recently completed)
MCR period is equal to the 3-year unweighted rolling average divided
by the number of available beds for the same period. The
IRB ratio for the previous MCR period is equal to the unweighted
resident FTE count for the previous MCR period divided by the number
of available beds for the same period. To comply as closely as possible
with Medicare rules and regulations, the Department applies a cap
on the IRB ratio pursuant to regulations at 42 CFR 412.105(a)(1),
whereby the ratio from the most recently filed (or most recently
completed) MCR period may not exceed the ratio for the hospital's
prior cost reporting period as defined above. Hospitals that meet
the criteria for an exception or adjustment to their 1996 Base Year
Cap (e.g. through a Medicare GME Affiliation Agreement) should refer
to the CMS August 1, 2001 Federal Register Notice which provides
additional information and guidance in determining the IRB ratio
subject to these exceptions.
Effective for portions of cost reporting periods and discharges
occurring on or after July 1, 2005, the CHGME PP will not include
resident FTEs counted against the §422 cap in the 3-year rolling
average calculation and the CHGME PP will not apply an IRB ratio
cap to the resident FTEs counted against a hospital’s §422 Cap Increase
for purposes of determining IME payments. A §422 IRB calculation
will be implemented as g |