The Critical Care Workforce: A Study of the Supply and
Demand for Critical Care Physicians
Chapter
5: Summary and Implications
Adequacy
of Critical Care Physician Supply: Implications for Vulnerable
Populations
The
PSM and PDM are national models that yield estimates for
the U.S. population as a whole. Although they can be adapted
to project supply and demand for smaller geographic regions
such as States, the models do little to inform the debate
regarding the future adequacy of physician supply in currently
underserved areas. Past government policies to improve
physician supply in underserved areas have relied in part
on the assumption that physician surpluses (especially surpluses
of primary care physicians) will create financial motivations
for physicians to gravitate to underserved areas. The projections
presented here suggest that the supply of physicians will
not outpace demand through 2020, which will create little
financial pressure for physicians to disperse to traditionally
underserved areas. The regional differences in total per
capita physician supply remain striking, as is demonstrated
in Exhibit 16, with geographic differences even greater
at the sub-region level.
Exhibit
16. Regional Variation in Active Physicians per 100,000
Population
[D]
Any
shortage of health care providers is likely to be worse
in areas (or for populations) that already have limited
access to physicians. This concern is particularly true
for access to specialists in rural areas where population
size may not support specialties that rely on a large patient
referral base and other members of an interdisciplinary
team to deliver effective care.
In their
analysis, Angus and colleagues found that intensivists were
more likely to provide care in larger hospitals (greater
than 300 beds), [49]
which are less likely to be present in rural areas. This
disparity may be further reinforced by the pressure from
payers to improve ICU staffing in urban hospitals ahead
of non-urban locations. As a previous Department of Health
and Human Services report explained, “the challenge lies
in understanding what these kinds of quality standards mean
for rural communities and whether they are relevant. While
the Leapfrog Group initially focused on urban measures,
the group has recently devoted attention to consideration
of patient safety standards for rural hospitals, realizing
that their focus needed to be system-wide.” [50]
However, current mechanisms of physician redistribution
might be examined for opportunities to improve access to
optimal patient care for underserved patients in the ICU.
[51]
Areas
for Future Research
Several
questions about the critical care workforce remain difficult
to answer. In particular, it is unclear how care directed
by intensivists leads to improved patient outcomes. [52]
Those related specifically to critical care training might
be achievable with other health care providers, such as
hospitalists, or through improved nurse staffing and the
availability of other specialists. Other organizational
characteristics may play a significant role, such as information
technology infrastructure in closed unit ICUs. Further
information about critical care providers and their training
are also of interest, including the distinction between
pulmonologists and intensivists and how these two inter-related
specialties will evolve.
In summary,
we project that if current trends continue, the growing
supply of intensivists will be insufficient to provide the
optimal level of care to future populations through 2020.
A lower bound of projected demand assumes that all growth
in demand for intensivist services is due to the growth
and aging of the population but the recent growth in intensivist
involvement in ICU care suggests that this lower estimate
is highly unlikely. Total employment opportunities will
likely grow faster than this lower bound as hospitals increasingly
staff their ICUs with intensivists. An upper bound on the
demand projections would occur if intensivists direct the
care of two-thirds of patients admitted to the ICU. The
likely demand for intensivists will likely lie somewhere
between this upper and lower bound, suggesting the need
to increase intensivist supply and to continue monitoring
trends in supply and demand.
|