|
This section explores
physician supply and demand issues as
they pertain to minority physicians and
discusses the implications for a country
that is growing more racially and ethnically
diverse.
A. Minority
Representation in the Physician Workforce
Approximately one in
four Americans is either Black or Hispanic,
yet together these two minority groups
constitute only 9 percent of the physician
workforce (Exhibits 69 and 70). Advocates
for increased minority representation
in the physician workforce argue that
minority under representation is more
than simply an equity concern, but that
increasing minority representation among
physicians will improve access to care
for minorities and vulnerable, underserved
populations.
Exhibit 69.
Physician Workforce, 2000
[D]
Source: AMA (2002)
Exhibit 70.
U.S. Population, 2000
[D]
Source: U.S. Census
Bureau
During the last 3 decades,
racial and ethnic minorities doubled as
a proportion of the U.S. population from
approximately 16 percent in 1970 to 31
percent in 2000. Minority representation
among U.S. medical school applicants,
candidates accepted, and graduates also
increased during this time; however, this
representation remains substantially below
the proportion of racial and ethnic minorities
in the U.S. population (Exhibit 71).
Even if there were a
dramatic increase in minority representation
in U.S. medical schools, the overall racial/ethnic
composition of the physician workforce
would change slowly because of the long
length of time to train new physicians
and because only a small portion of the
current workforce retires each year.
Exhibit 71.
Minority Graduates from U.S. Medical Schools:
1970-2000
[D]
Sources: Census Bureau, AAMC (2001).
Although minorities
are underrepresented in U.S. medical schools,
approximately one in five practicing physicians
in the United States graduated from an
international medical school, and the
majority of these IMGs are racial or ethnic
minorities. India, Pakistan, and the
Philippines together produce approximately
40 percent of the IMGs practicing in the
United States (AMA, 2002).
Exhibit 72.
Distribution of IMGs by Country of Graduation
[D]
Source: AMA (2002) fact
sheet.
Minority physicians
are under represented in academic medicine
and relatively few hold senior positions.
Palepu et al. (1998), in their study of
medical school faculty, find statistically
significant differences between minority
and non-Hispanic White physicians in promotion
rates and representation in senior positions.
The authors report that controlling for
tenure, White faculty are more likely
to attain a senior position and are more
likely to be tenured or on a tenured track
than are minority physicians. While White
faculty had more first-authored and total
peer-reviewed publications than their
minority colleagues, there were no differences
in the types of research grants or the
median number of grants held. In terms
of academic productivity, all groups reported
similar hours for a typical work week,
although minority physicians in academic
medicine spend more time in patient care
and less time in research activities compared
to their non-minority colleagues (Palepu
et al., 2000). Controlling for differences
in productivity, the authors still find
that minority faculty are less likely
to be promoted to associate or full professor
positions as compared to non-Hispanic
white faculty. Black faculty are significantly
less likely than White faculty to hold
a senior position. Hispanic and Asian
faculty are also less likely than their
non-Hispanic White colleagues to hold
a senior position, but this difference
is not statistically significant. Some
have argued that increasing the number
of minority physicians in higher levels
of academic medicine provides role models
that can help to recruit more minorities
into the medical profession.
The percent of physicians
who are either Black or Hispanic differs
significantly by specialty. AMA (2004)
reports that although Blacks constituted
4 percent of the physician workforce in
2002 (for those physicians who report
race and ethnicity), Blacks had greater
representation in general preventive medicine
(8 percent), obstetrics/gynecology (7
percent) and public health (5 percent).
Blacks had lower representation in specialties
such as medical genetics (2 percent),
radiation oncology (2 percent) and allergy
and immunology (2 percent). Similarly,
Hispanics constituted 5 percent of the
physician workforce in 2002, but Hispanics
had greater representation in general
and family practice (11 percent), child
psychiatry (7 percent) and pediatrics
(7 percent). Hispanics had lower representation
in orthopedic surgery (2 percent), radiology
(3 percent), and dermatology (3 percent).
There exists a paucity
of research on the specialty choice of
minority physicians and the reasons why
minority representation differs substantially
by specialty. One possibility is that
minority physicians have a greater propensity
to choose primary care specialties that
are in high demand in largely minority,
rural and inner-city areas that are Federally
designated as health professional shortage
areas (HPSAs). Studies have found that
minority physicians have a greater propensity
than do White, non-Hispanic physicians
to practice in HPSAs and to serve uninsured
and Medicaid patients.
- Komaromy et al. (1996),
in a study investigating the association
between physician supply and the demographics
of 394 communities in California, found
an inverse relationship between the
concentration of Blacks and Hispanics
and the number of physicians per population.
In urban areas, a 10 percent increase
in the proportion of residents who are
Black is associated with an 8.9 decrease
in the number of primary care physicians
per 100,000 residents. This inverse
relationship is also present in rural
communities.
- Keith et al. (1985)
also find that new, minority physicians
are more likely to practice in Federally
designated HPSAs than are non-Hispanic
Whites (11.6 percent versus 6.1 percent
of new physicians). Furthermore, among
those who were Black and Hispanic, physicians
generally practiced in areas with relatively
high proportions of their own race and
ethnic group. In fact, Black physicians
practiced in areas where the mean percentage
of black residents was four times as
high as in areas where other physicians
practiced (P < .001) and Hispanic
physicians practiced in areas where
the mean percentage of Hispanic residents
was considerably higher than in areas
where non-Hispanic physicians practiced
(P < .001).
- Moy and Bartman
(1995) find that minority physicians
are more likely than are non-minority
physicians to provide care to Medicaid
beneficiaries. This finding is consistent
with those of Komaromy et al. who find
that Medicaid beneficiaries accounted
for 45 percent of patients of Black
physicians, 30 percent of patients of
Asian physicians, 24 percent of patients
of Hispanic physicians, and 18 percent
of the patients of non-Hispanic White
physicians. Hispanic physicians had
the highest percentage of patients who
were uninsured compared to physicians
of other racial/ethnic groups. Moy
and Bartman find that medically indigent
patients are between 1.4 and 2.6 times
more likely to receive care from non-White
physicians than are affluent patients.
Thus, increasing minority
representation in medical schools could
help to reduce geographic imbalances in
physician supply and, in particular, could
improve supply in areas with large, vulnerable
populations.
B. Minority
Patients and Demand for Physician Services
Demand for health care
services by minorities is increasing as
the population of minorities grow and
become a higher percentage of the U.S.
population. Between 2000 and 2020, the
percentage of total patient care hours
physicians spend with minority patients
will rise from approximately 31 percent
to 40 percent (BHPr, 2003).
Because age distribution
and health care utilization patterns differ
substantially by race and ethnicity, there
is substantial variation across physician
specialties in the percent of total patient
care hours spent serving minority patients
(BHPr, 2003). For example, in 2000 an
estimated 13 percent of total patient
care hours were spent providing care to
Black patients (Exhibit 73). Black patients’
percent of total patient care hours was
highest in emergency medicine (38 percent),
obstetrics/gynecology (17 percent) and
pediatrics (16 percent). The percent
of total patient care hours spent providing
care to Black patients was lowest in the
surgical specialties.
The percentage of total
physician time spent caring for Hispanic
and other non-Black minority patients
in 2000 was 21 percent. The proportion
of patient care hours provided to non-Black
minority patients was highest for radiology
(31 percent), pathology (29 percent) and
pediatrics (23 percent), and lowest for
urology (11 percent), ophthalmology (11
percent) and general and family practice
(13 percent).
Research suggests that
there is a strong tendency for minority
patients to use minority physicians as
their usual care providers. What is not
clear is whether this is a supply or demand
phenomenon. In a study investigating
the relationship between physician race
and the care of minority and medically
indigent patients, Moy and Bartman (1995)
determined that more than a third of minority
patients are treated by minority physicians.
Only 11 percent of non-Hispanic, White
patients are treated by minority physicians.
The authors also find that minority physicians,
in particular Asian and Black physicians,
are more likely to care for patients outside
their own minority group than are non-Hispanic,
White physicians.
Much attention has been
paid to the issue of culturally competent
care, which argues that more effective
care is provided when clinicians and patients
have similar cultural backgrounds and
speak the same language. To the extent
that minority physicians provide more
culturally competent care than do non-minority
physicians, or that patients prefer to
receive care from physicians of similar
race or ethnicity, significant increases
in the number of minority physicians—and
in particular Black and Hispanic physicians—are
needed to meet the growth in demand for
physician services by minority populations.
Exhibit 73.
Estimated Percentage of Patient Care Hours,
by Race of Patient
|
Physician
Specialty |
2000 |
2020a |
|
Non-Hispanic
White |
Non-Hispanic
Black |
Hispanic
and All Other |
Non-Hispanic
White |
Non-Hispanic
Black |
Hispanic
and All Other |
|
Total
Patient Care Physicians |
69
|
13
|
18
|
60
|
14
|
26
|
|
General
Primary Care |
72
|
13
|
15
|
63
|
14
|
24
|
|
GP & FP |
78
|
10
|
13
|
69
|
11
|
20
|
|
General Internal Med. |
72
|
14
|
14
|
63
|
15
|
23
|
|
Pediatrics |
61
|
16
|
23
|
51
|
17
|
32
|
|
Medical
Specialties |
71
|
13
|
16
|
62
|
13
|
25
|
|
IM Subspecialties |
71
|
13
|
16
|
62
|
13
|
25
|
|
Cardiovascular Diseases |
73
|
11
|
15
|
64
|
12
|
24
|
|
Other Medical Specialties |
70
|
13
|
17
|
60
|
13
|
26
|
|
Surgery |
71
|
12
|
17
|
62
|
12
|
26
|
|
General Surgery |
70
|
9
|
22
|
59
|
9
|
32
|
|
Obstetrics/Gynecology |
66
|
17
|
17
|
57
|
18
|
25
|
|
Otolaryngology |
75
|
11
|
14
|
67
|
12
|
21
|
|
Orthopedic Surgery |
72
|
11
|
17
|
62
|
11
|
27
|
|
Urology |
78
|
11
|
11
|
71
|
12
|
17
|
|
Ophthalmology |
78
|
10
|
11
|
71
|
11
|
18
|
|
Other Surgical Specialties |
73
|
8
|
19
|
62
|
8
|
30
|
|
Other
Patient Care |
64
|
15
|
21
|
53
|
15
|
32
|
|
Psychiatry |
73
|
11
|
16
|
62
|
11
|
26
|
|
Anesthesiology |
66
|
14
|
21
|
56
|
13
|
31
|
|
Emergency Medicine |
47
|
38
|
16
|
39
|
39
|
22
|
|
Radiology |
56
|
14
|
31
|
45
|
12
|
43
|
|
Pathology |
60
|
11
|
29
|
48
|
10
|
42
|
|
Other Specialties |
67
|
13
|
20
|
57
|
13
|
30
|
|
Total
U.S. Population |
69
|
12
|
19
|
61
|
13
|
26
|
Source: BHPr (2003).
a These projections assume
that per capita utilization patterns remain
constant over time, although utilization
patterns can differ by patient age, sex,
and race/ethnicity. Note: percentages
might not sum to 100 percent due to rounding.
|