|
|
  |
 |
  |
Dental HPSA Designation Criteria
Also see:
Part I -- Geographic Areas
A. Criteria.
A geographic area will be designated as having a
dental professional shortage if the following three
criteria are met:
1. The area is a rational area for the delivery
of dental services.
2. One of the following conditions prevails in
the area:
(a) The area has a population to full-time-equivalent
dentist ratio of at least 5,000:1, or
(b) The area has a population to full-time-equivalent
dentist ratio of less than 5,000:1 but greater
than 4,000:1 and has unusually high needs for
dental services or insufficient capacity of existing
dental providers.
3. Dental professionals in contiguous areas
are overutilized, excessively distant, or inaccessible
to the population of the area under consideration.
B. Methodology.
In determining whether an area meets the criteria
established by paragraph A of this part, the following
methodology will be used:
1. Rational Area for the Delivery of Dental
Services.
(a) The following areas will be considered rational
areas for the delivery of dental health services:
(i) A county, or a group of several contiguous
counties whose population centers are within
40 minutes travel time of each other.
(ii) A portion of a county (or an area made
up of portions of more than one county) whose
population, because of topography, market or
transportation patterns, distinctive population
characteristics, or other factors, has limited
access to contiguous area resources, as measured
generally by a travel time of greater than 40
minutes to such resources.
(iii) Established neighborhoods and communities
within metropolitan areas which display a strong
self-identity (as indicated by a homogenous
socioeconomic or demographic structure and/or
a traditional of interaction or intradependency),
have limited interaction with contiguous areas,
and which, in general, have a minimum population
of 20,000.
(b) The following distances will be used as guidelines
in determining distances corresponding to 40 minutes
travel time:
(i) Under normal conditions with primary roads
available: 25 miles.
(ii) In mountainous terrain or in areas with
only secondary roads available: 20 miles.
(iii) In flat terrain or in areas connected
by interstate highways: 30 miles.
Within inner portions of metropolitan areas, information
on the public transportation system will be used to
determine the distance corresponding to 40 minutes
travel time.
2. Population Count.
The population count use will be the total permanent
resident civilian population of the area, excluding
inmates of institutions, with the following adjustments:
(a) Seasonal residents, i.e., those who maintain
a residence in the area but inhabit it for only
2 to 8 months per year, may be included but must
be weighted in proportion to the fraction of the
year they are present in the area.
(b) Migratory workers and their families may
be included in an area's population using the
following formula: Effective migrant contribution
to population = (fraction of year migrants are
present in area) x (average daily number of migrants
during portion of year that migrants are present).
3. Counting of
Dental Practitioners.
(a) All non-Federal dentists providing patient
care will be counted, except in those areas where
it is shown that specialists (those dentists not
in general practice or pedodontics) are serving
a larger area and are not addressing the general
dental care needs of the area under consideration.
(b) Full-time equivalent (FTE) figures will be
used to reflect productivity differences among
dental practices based on the age of the dentists,
the number of auxiliaries employed, and the number
of hours worked per week. In general, the number
of FTE dentists will be computed using weights
obtained from the matrix in Table 1, which is
based on the productivity of dentists at various
ages, with different numbers of auxiliaries, as
compared with the average productivity of all
dentists. For the purposes of these determinations,
an auxiliary is defined as any non-dentist staff
employed by the dentist to assist in operation
of the practice.
TABLE 1 - EQUIVALENCY WEIGHTS,
BY AGE AND NUMBER OF AUXILIARIES
|  |
<55 |
55-59 |
60-64 |
65+ |
| No auxiliaries |
0.8 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
| One auxiliary |
1.0 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
0.7 |
| Two auxiliaries |
1.2 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
| Three auxiliaries |
1.4 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
| Four auxiliaries |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
If information on the number of auxiliaries employed
by the dentist is not available, Table 2 will be used
tocompute the number of full-time equivalent dentists.
TABLE
2 - EQUIVALENCY WEIGHTS, BY AGE
| |
<55 |
55-59 |
60-64 |
65+ |
| Equivalency
Weights |
1.2 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
The number of FTE dentists within a particular
age group (or age/auxiliary group) will be obtained
by multiplying the number of dentists within that
group by its corresponding equivalency weight.
The total supply of FTE dentists within an area
is then computed as the sum of those dentists
within each age (or age/auxiliary) group.
(c) The equivalency weights specified in tables
1 and 2 assume that dentists within a particular
group are working full-time (40 hours per week).
Where appropriate data are available, adjusted
equivalency figures for dentists who are semi-retired,
who operate a reduced practice due to infirmity
or other limiting conditions, or who are available
to the population of an area only on a part-time
basis will be used to reflect the reduced availability
of these dentists. In computing these equivalency
figures, every 4 hours (or 1/2 day) spent in the
dental practice will be counted as 0.1 FTE except
that each dentist working more than 40 hours a
week will be counted as 1.0. The count obtained
for a particular age group of dentists will then
be multiplied by the appropriate equivalency weight
from table 1 or 2 to obtain a full-time equivalent
figure for dentists within that particular age
orage/auxiliary category.
4. Determination of Unusually High Needs for
Dental Services.
An area will be considered as having unusually
high needs for dental services if at least one of
the following criteria is met:
(a) More than 20% of the population (or of all
households) has incomes below the poverty level.
(b) The majority of the area's population does
not have a fluoridated water supply.
5. Determination of Insufficient Capacity of
Existing Dental Care Providers.
An area's existing dental care providers will be
considered to have insufficient capacity if at least
two of the following criteria are met:
(a) More than 5,000 visits per year per FTE dentist
serving the area.
(b) Unusually long waits for appointments for
routine dental services (i.e., more than 6 weeks).
(c) A substantial proportion (2/3 or more) of
the area's dentists do not accept new patients.
6. Contiguous Area Considerations.
Dental professional(s) in areas contiguous to an
area being considered for designation will be considered
excessively distant, overutilized or inaccessible
to the population of the area under consideration
if one of the following conditions prevails in each
contiguous area:
(a) Dental professional(s) in the contiguous
area are more than 40 minutes travel time from
the center of the area being considered for designation
(measured in accordance with Paragraph B.1.(b)
of this part).
(b) Contiguous area population-to-(FTE) dentist
ratios are in excess of 3,000:1, indicating that
resources in contiguous areas cannot be expected
to help alleviate the shortage situation in the
area being considered for designation.
(c) Dental professional(s) in the contiguous
area are inaccessible to the population of the
area under consideration because of specified
access barriers, such as:
(i) Significant differences between the demographic
(or socioeconomic) characteristics of the area
under consideration and those of the contiguous
area, indicating that the population of the
area under consideration may be effectively
isolated from nearby resources. Such isolation
could be indicated, for example, by an unusually
high proportion of non-English-speaking persons.
(ii) A lack of economic access to contiguous
area resources, particularly where a very high
proportion of the population of the area under
consideration is poor (i.e., where more than
20 percent of the population or of the households
have incomes below the poverty level) and Medicaid-covered
or public dental services are not available
in the contiguous area.
Part II -- Population Groups
A. Criteria.
1. In general, specified population groups within
particular geographic areas will be designated as
having a shortage of dental care professional(s)
if the following three criteria are met:
a. The area in which they reside is rational
for the delivery of dental care services, as defined
in paragraph B.1 of part I of this appendix.
b. Access barriers prevent the population group
from use of the area's dental providers.
c. The ratio (R) of the number of persons in
the population group to the number of dentists
practicing in the area and serving the population
group is at least 4,000:1.
2. Indians and Alaska Natives will be considered
for designation as having shortages of dental professional(s)
as follows:
(a) Groups of members of Indian tribes (as defined
in section 4(d) of Pub. L. 94 - 437, the Indian
Health Care Improvement Act of 1976) are automatically
designated.
(b) Other groups of Indians or Alaska Natives
(as defined in section 4(c) of Pub. L. 94 - 437)
will be designated if the general criteria in
paragraph 1 are met.
Part III -- Facilities
A. Federal and State Correctional Institutions.
1. Criteria.
Medium to maximum security Federal and State correctional
institutions and youth detention facilities will
be designated as having a shortage of dental professional(s)
if both the following criteria are met:
(a) The institution has at least 250 inmates.
(b) The ratio of the number of internees per
year to the number of FTE dentists serving the
institution is at least 1,500:1.
Here the number of internees is defined as follows:
(i) If the number of new inmates per year and
the average length-of-stay (ALOS) are not specified,
or if the information provided does not indicate
that intake dental examinations are routinely
performed by dentists upon entry, then -- Number
of internees = average number of inmates.
(ii) If the ALOS is specified as one year or
more, and intake dental examinations are routinely
performed upon entry, then -- Number of internees
= average number of inmates + number of new
inmates per year.
(iii) If the ALOS is specified as less than
one year, and intake dental examinations are
routinely performed upon entry, then -- Number
of internees = average number of inmates + 1/3
x (1 + 2 x ALOS) x number of new inmates per
year where ALOS = average length-of-stay (in
fraction of year). (The number of FTE dentists
is computed as in part I, section B, paragraph
3 above.)
B. Public or Non-Profit Private Dental Facilities.
1. Criteria.
Public or nonprofit private facilties providing
general dental care services will be designated
as having a shortage of dental professional(s) if
both of the following criteria are met:
(a) The facility is providing general dental
care services to an area or population group designated
as having a dental professional(s) shortage; and
(b) The facility has insufficent capacity to
meet the dental care needs of that area or population
group.
2. Methodology.
In determining whether public or nonprofit private
facilities meet the criteria established by paragraph
B.1. of this part, the following methodology will
be used:
(a) Provision of Services to a Designated
Area or Population Group.
A facility will be considered to be providing
services to an area or population group if
either:
(i) A majority of the facility's dental care
services are being provided to residents of
designated dental professional(s) shortage
areas or to population groups designated as
having a shortage of dental professional(s);
or
(ii) The population within a designated dental
shortage area or population group has reasonable
access to dental services provided at the
facility. Reasonable access will be assumed
if the population lies within 40 minutes travel
time of the facility and non-physical barriers
(relating to demographic and socioeconomic
characteristics of the population) do not
prevent the population from receiving care
at the facility.
Migrant health centers (as defined in section
319(a)(1) of the Act) which are located in
areas with designated migrant population groups
and Indian Health Service facilities are assumed
to be meeting this requirement.
(b) Insufficient Capacity To Meet Dental Care
Needs.
A facility will be considered to have insufficient
capacity to meet the dental care needs of
a designated area or population group if either
of the following conditions exists at the
facility.
(i) There are more than 5,000 outpatient
visits per year per FTE dentist on the staff
of the facility. (Here the number of FTE dentists
is computed as in part I, section B, paragraph
3 above.)
(ii) Waiting time for appointments is more
than 6 weeks for routine dental services.
RELEVANT EXCERPTS FROM 42 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS (CFR), CHAPTER 1, PART 5, Appendix B (October 1, 1993, pp. 34-48)
Criteria for Designation of Areas Having Shortages of Dental Professionals [45 FR 76000, Nov. 17, 1980, as amended at 54
FR 8738, Mar. 2, 1989; 57 FR 2480, Jan. 22, 1992]
|
 |
 |
 |
|